k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN)
A simple, non-parametric algorithm that classifies data points based on the class of their k nearest neighbors in the feature space. It uses the principle that similar data points tend to have similar labels.
kNN works by finding the k closest data points to a query point and assigning the most common class among these neighbors. The distance is typically measured using Euclidean distance in the feature space.
For a test point xtest and training points {x1, x2, ..., xn}, the algorithm follows a simple process.
Where Nk(xtest) represents the set of k nearest neighbors to the test point.
Interactive kNN Visualization
Interactive Parameters
Number of nearest neighbors to consider
Total number of training samples
X coordinate of test point
Y coordinate of test point
Interactive Plot:
💡 Try: hover over elements, zoom with mouse wheel, pan by dragging, use toolbar buttons
Key Concepts
Understanding kNN requires grasping several important concepts about how the algorithm makes decisions.
Choosing k
- Small k (e.g., k=1): More sensitive to noise, can lead to overfitting
- Large k: Smoother decision boundaries, but may lose local patterns
- Odd k: Helps avoid ties in binary classification
- Rule of thumb: k ≈ √n, where n is the number of training samples
Distance Metrics
kNN can use different distance metrics:
- Euclidean: Standard straight-line distance
- Manhattan: Sum of absolute differences
- Minkowski: Generalized distance metric
Distance Formulas
Advantages and Disadvantages
Like any algorithm, kNN has both strengths and weaknesses that make it suitable for certain types of problems.
Advantages
- → Simple to understand and implement
- → No assumptions about data distribution
- → Works well with small datasets
- → Can be used for both classification and regression
- → Naturally handles multi-class problems
Disadvantages
- → Computationally expensive for large datasets
- → Sensitive to irrelevant features (curse of dimensionality)
- → Sensitive to scale of features
- → No model to interpret
- → Memory intensive (stores all training data)
Common Misconception: Larger k is always better
While larger k values create smoother decision boundaries and reduce overfitting, they can also lead to underfitting by oversimplifying the decision boundary and missing important local patterns in the data.
Key Takeaways
- → kNN is intuitive: "Tell me who your neighbors are, and I'll tell you who you are"
- → The choice of k is crucial and should be validated using cross-validation
- → Feature scaling is essential for good performance
- → Consider computational complexity for large datasets
- → Works well for datasets where local similarity is meaningful
- → Can provide probability estimates based on neighbor class proportions